CRC Credit Research Compendium
Menu
日本語English

Issuer Credit Research

Issuer Flash: PT Pertamina Hulu Energi - 2025 Results / Fitch Rating Action

Issuer Flash: PT Pertamina Hulu Energi - 2025 Results / Fitch Rating Action

Report date: 2026-05-14 Event date: 2026-05-13 Event title: 2025 Results

Flash Conclusion

The latest disclosure and rating action do not change the core view in the recent issuer_summary that PHE's credit profile is based on a strong standalone upstream credit profile plus linkage to Pertamina and the Indonesian sovereign. In 2025, revenue and net profit declined, while impairment charges and depreciation, depletion and amortisation weighed on earnings. Even so, Fitch's indicated EBITDA of around USD7bn, year-end 2025 cash of around USD2.8bn, and EBITDA net leverage of 0.1x show that PHE's standalone financial profile remains strong. At the same time, the BBB / Negative affirmation on 2026-05-13 is an event that reconfirms that the rating direction is constrained more by parent Pertamina and the Indonesian sovereign than by PHE's standalone financial metrics.

What has changed versus the recent issuer_summary is that the 2025 results and the 2026-2028 capex and dividend burden have become more concrete. What has not changed is that PHE is the core upstream entity and is less directly exposed to downstream, refining, and fuel-compensation receivable risks, while still carrying risks as a subsidiary issuer, including parent-rating linkage, dividends, intra-group cash movement, and unverified bond-document terms.

What Was Announced

On 2026-05-13, Fitch affirmed PHE's Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating at BBB with a Negative Outlook, and also rated the USD3bn global medium-term note programme, USD1bn notes, and senior unsecured debt level at BBB. PHE's standalone credit profile is bbb, but the Negative Outlook reflects the Negative Outlook on parent Pertamina. Pertamina's outlook is linked to the Indonesian sovereign rating, and a downgrade of Pertamina would be a downgrade trigger for PHE.

PHE's official Financial Reports page confirms that the Audited Financial Statements 2025 have been posted. However, because the PDF body could not be directly extracted in this working environment, the figures used here are limited to those that can be confirmed from the official posting, Fitch, and Petromindo articles citing the audited financial statements. The confirmed 2025 results are revenue of USD13.82bn, gross profit of USD4.50bn, pre-tax profit of USD3.67bn, net profit of USD2.18bn, total assets of USD31.15bn, and oil and gas properties of USD17.46bn. The main reasons for the decline in net profit were impairment of non-financial assets of USD1.10bn and an increase in DD&A to around USD2.91bn.

Fitch indicated 2025 EBITDA of around USD7bn, cash of around USD2.8bn, and EBITDA net leverage of 0.1x. Against year-end 2025 cash, PHE has loan maturities of around USD900mn in 2026, around USD500mn in 2027, and around USD300mn in 2028. Operationally, 2025 production was around 1mn boe/d, with oil accounting for 54%; proved reserves were around 2.3bn boe, and reserve life was 7.4 years.

Credit Read-Through

First, comfort around near-term repayment capacity is maintained. Revenue and net profit declined, but EBITDA of around USD7bn, cash of around USD2.8bn, and net leverage of 0.1x remain well above the roughly USD900mn of loan maturities in 2026. Net profit moves with impairment charges, reserve valuation, depreciation and amortisation, and oil-price assumptions, so the earnings decline should not immediately be read as a deterioration in debt repayment capacity.

Second, the impairment charges and higher DD&A show that PHE is a capital-intensive upstream company. One of its clear strengths is its position as one of the largest domestic producers, but maintaining production requires development investment, enhanced recovery, exploration, block renewals, and acquisitions. The 2025 impairment should not be dismissed simply as accounting noise.

Third, the rating story is led by parent and sovereign linkage. Fitch identifies PHE's operating scale, reserves, and financial metrics as strengths, but PHE's IDR is at the same level as Pertamina's, and a downgrade of Pertamina would be a direct downgrade trigger.

Fourth, free cash flow should be viewed as moving in a weaker direction. Fitch assumes average annual capex and acquisition-related spending of USD6.6bn and average annual dividends of USD2.2bn over 2026-2028, and expects EBITDA net leverage to rise to 1.5x in 2028. This level remains manageable, but reliance on external borrowing and refinancing will increase.

Fifth, reserves and production are "strong but need monitoring". Production scale of around 1mn boe/d is a clear strength, but Fitch explains that 2025 production declined by 1% and that proved reserves also declined after increasing in 2023 and 2024. A reserve life of 7.4 years cannot be described as particularly long from a long-dated bond investor's perspective.

From a bondholder perspective, legal protections remain to be confirmed. The USD3bn GMTN programme and USD1bn notes were affirmed at BBB, but guarantees, negative pledge, cross-default, change of control, restricted payments, subsidiary guarantees, and the presence or absence of security have not been directly verified in the Offering Circular.

What To Watch Next

The top priority is direct review of the body of PHE's 2025 audited financial statements PDF. Operating cash flow, investing cash flow, dividends, related-party transactions, debt maturity schedule, interest expense, and undrawn committed lines should be checked to assess how heavy Fitch's assumed high capex and dividends are relative to actual cash flow.

Next, the 2025 reserve replacement ratio, production and reserves by block, and unit lifting cost should be confirmed. The decline in proved reserves and reserve life of 7.4 years are important for long-dated bond investors.

Pertamina's and Indonesia's sovereign ratings and outlooks, Pertamina's compensation receivable collection, downstream and refining burden, Danantara-related capital allocation, and group dividend policy should also continue to be monitored. A downgrade originating from the parent or sovereign could flow directly through to PHE's rating.

Finally, the Offering Circular for the USD notes / GMTN programme and current market levels should be checked separately. This note has not verified live bond prices, yields, or spreads, so it does not conclude whether PHE is cheap or expensive versus Pertamina parent bonds, Indonesian government bonds, PGN, PGE, PTTEP, ONGC, or other comparables.

Sources

Unverified / Pending

  1. Direct extraction of the body of PHE's 2025 audited financial statements PDF. The official page confirms that the statements have been posted, but the PDF body could not be directly viewed or extracted in this working environment.
  2. Direct confirmation from the official financial statements of 2025 operating cash flow, investing cash flow, free cash flow, dividends, related-party transactions, debt maturity schedule, and interest expense.
  3. 2025 reserve replacement ratio, production and reserves by block, unit lifting cost, and capital efficiency of development investment.
  4. Confirmation through the Offering Circular of the guarantee, ranking, negative pledge, cross-default, change of control, restricted payments, subsidiary guarantees, and security for the USD3bn GMTN programme / USD1bn notes.
  5. Moody's latest 2026 action on PHE / Pertamina. The 2025 Baa2 / BCA baa2 has been confirmed in existing materials, but the latest primary confirmation for 2026 remains outstanding.
  6. Live price and spread comparison of PHE notes versus Pertamina parent bonds, Indonesian government bonds, PGN, PGE, PTTEP, ONGC, and other comparables.