CRC Credit Research Compendium
Menu
日本語English

Issuer Credit Research

Issuer Flash: LG Energy Solution Ltd.

Issuer Flash: LG Energy Solution Ltd.

Report date: 2026-05-28 Event date: 2026-04-30 Event title: Q1 2026 Results

1. Flash Conclusion

LG Energy Solution’s (LGES) Q1 2026 results confirmed the view set out in the latest issuer_summary that the company remains an investment-grade credit, but one that is capital-intensive and susceptible to downward pressure. Revenue increased modestly quarter on quarter to KRW6.555 trillion, but the operating loss widened to KRW208 billion, operating cash flow was an outflow of KRW316 billion, and capital expenditure was KRW1.648 trillion. This was not a quarter that confirmed a recovery. Rather, it should be read as a quarter in which earnings and funding pressure remained heavy while the company was still in the middle of a product transition.

The key credit issue is that LGES remained loss-making at the operating level even after including KRW190 billion of North American production incentives in revenue. Order intake and capacity expansion for ESS and 46-Series cylindrical batteries provide support, but start-up costs for ESS, lower shipments of North American pouch-type EV batteries, and an adverse product mix weighed on earnings. Borrowings also increased to KRW24.682 trillion at end-March 2026, while the net debt-to-equity ratio rose to 70%.

Accordingly, these results alone do not require a one-notch downward reassessment of the credit profile, but the direction of travel remains biased to the downside. The focus should be less on the size of the order backlog or production capacity and more on whether operating losses, operating cash flow, capital expenditure, and further debt growth all improve from Q2 2026 onward.

2. Announced Results

LGES announced on 30 April 2026 its results for the three months ended 31 March 2026. From FY2026, North American production incentives are presented as part of revenue, and the 2025 comparative figures have also been adjusted to the same basis. On this basis, revenue increased 1.2% quarter on quarter and declined 2.5% year on year.

The company explained that shipments of pouch-type EV batteries declined due to inventory adjustments by major North American customers, while shipments of cylindrical batteries and ESS supported revenue. ESS accounted for the mid-20% range of revenue. However, operating earnings remained in the red, with start-up costs at ESS production sites and product mix deterioration weighing heavily. On the operating side, new Q1 orders for 46-Series cylindrical batteries exceeded 100GWh, and the order backlog exceeded 440GWh as of end-April 2026. Some additional ESS contracts begin supply in 2028 and should be treated as visibility on medium-term demand.

3. Credit Interpretation

The most important point in these results is that, even though revenue increased quarter on quarter, operating losses and operating cash outflow remained. In the battery business, orders and production capacity do not automatically translate into profit or cash. They become a source of debt repayment only after passing through customer vehicle sales, inventory adjustments, plant ramp-up, yield, pricing, and subsidy conditions. Q1 2026 showed that this conversion process remains unstable.

The operating loss should be read less as a simple disappearance of demand and more as the simultaneous impact of product transition and changes in customer plans. Growth in ESS demand and larger cylindrical battery orders are positive over the medium term, but ESS start-up costs weighed on near-term earnings. The decline in pouch-type EV battery shipments again shows that inventory adjustments by major North American customers can flow directly through to LGES’s utilisation and product mix.

Funding conditions require caution. Operating cash flow in Q1 2026 was an outflow of KRW316 billion, with working capital a KRW1.044 trillion negative factor. On a simple basis of deducting capital expenditure from operating cash flow, the company recorded a funding outflow of roughly KRW2.0 trillion. Cash and cash equivalents, at KRW3.745 trillion, did not decline substantially, but this was supported partly by a KRW1.189 trillion inflow from financing cash flow, including a KRW2.170 trillion net inflow from borrowings less repayments.

4. Key Figures

Metric Q1 2026 Q4 2025 Q1 2025 Credit interpretation
Revenue KRW6.555 trillion KRW6.474 trillion KRW6.723 trillion Modest increase quarter on quarter, but down year on year
North American production incentives KRW190 billion KRW333 billion KRW458 billion Operating loss even including subsidies
Operating profit/loss KRW208 billion loss KRW122 billion loss KRW375 billion profit Loss widened
EBITDA KRW887 billion KRW913 billion KRW1.231 trillion Pre-depreciation earnings remain, but are insufficient to absorb the investment burden
Net profit/loss KRW944 billion loss KRW772 billion loss KRW227 billion profit Bottom-line earnings also weak
Operating cash flow KRW316 billion outflow KRW1.753 trillion inflow KRW1.162 trillion inflow Turned to outflow due to working capital deterioration
Capital expenditure KRW1.648 trillion KRW2.515 trillion KRW3.014 trillion Lower, but still far above operating cash flow
Interest-bearing debt KRW24.682 trillion KRW22.512 trillion KRW17.613 trillion Borrowings continue to increase
Net debt-to-equity ratio 70% 64% 45% Leverage has deteriorated

Capital expenditure is based on “Investment in Facilities” in the company’s presentation materials.

5. Items to Monitor Next

From Q2 2026 onward, the highest priority is to monitor whether the operating loss narrows and operating cash flow returns to positive territory. The analysis should compare not only operating profit or loss including North American production incentives, but also profitability excluding subsidies, ESS start-up costs, pouch-type EV battery shipments, and cylindrical battery mass-production yields. In addition, the extent to which the company’s selective approach to capital expenditure, disposal of non-core assets, and improvement in asset turnover translate into a narrower free cash flow deficit and slower debt growth will be central to assessing rating headroom.

6. Sources

Unverified / Pending