CRC Credit Research Compendium
Menu
日本語English

Issuer Credit Research

MISC Berhad Results Flash: FY2025 Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year Results

MISC Berhad Results Flash: FY2025 Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year Results

Report date: 2026-05-22 Event date: 2026-02-24 Event title: FY2025 Results

Flash Conclusion

MISC Berhad (“MISC”)’s FY2025 fourth-quarter and full-year results are modestly positive for credit. Revenue declined, but for the full year, operating profit, profit before tax, profit attributable to owners of the parent, and operating cash flow all improved, while cash headroom against short-term interest-bearing debt remained substantial. The repayment of the USD400mn GMTN that matured in April 2025 using internal funds also supports the liquidity assessment.

That said, this is less a case of a materially stronger credit profile and more a set of results that confirms the resilience of an investment-grade issuer. The decline in revenue reflected contract expiries, vessel disposals, vessel idling, lower charter rates in Gas Assets & Solutions, and lower project progress in Marine & Heavy Engineering. The profit improvement also includes non-recurring elements, so it would be too strong to treat the full amount as repeatable underlying earnings.

From a credit perspective, the conclusion is: stable investment-grade profile, strong short-term liquidity, but continued monitoring needed for market-driven earnings and capital expenditure burden. PETRONAS ownership is supportive, but MISC’s debt is not directly guaranteed by PETRONAS or the Malaysian government.

What Was Announced

On 24 February 2026, MISC announced its FY2025 fourth-quarter and full-year results. Full-year revenue was RM11.15bn, down from the previous year, while operating profit was RM2.78bn, profit before tax was RM1.86bn, and profit attributable to owners of the parent was RM1.70bn, with full-year earnings above the prior year. Cash flow from operating activities was strong, at RM5.64bn on the company release basis and RM5.66bn on the audited financial statements basis.

For the fourth quarter, revenue was RM2.81bn, below the same period of the previous year, but operating profit was RM507.6mn, above the prior-year quarter, and profit before tax returned to positive territory. However, profit attributable to owners of the parent remained in a small loss, so quarterly volatility remains.

By segment, Gas Assets & Solutions was affected by contract expiries, vessel disposals, vessel idling, and lower charter rates. Petroleum & Product Shipping continued to make a significant profit contribution, but its exposure to tanker market volatility remains. In Offshore Business, the transition of an FPSO from the construction phase to the operating phase contributed to the improvement in earnings. Marine & Heavy Engineering saw lower revenue due to reduced project progress, but improved from the loss-making situation in the previous year.

On the financial side, cash and bank balances at end-FY2025 were RM6.10bn, interest-bearing borrowings were RM12.88bn, and short-term interest-bearing borrowings were RM1.92bn. Cash coverage is ample relative to short-term debt, but cash and bank balances include restricted cash, so they should be distinguished from cash equivalents. Net debt/equity was 0.20x, improving from 0.23x at end-2024. The “lease liabilities and borrowings” figure in the company release was RM15.09bn, which differs in scope from interest-bearing borrowings in the financial statements; both should therefore be considered in the liquidity assessment.

Dividends are high. The FY2025 dividend per share was 38 sen, and the total dividend was approximately RM1.61bn, close to profit attributable to owners of the parent. If this coincides with a market downturn or higher investment, it could pressure internal retention.

Credit Read-Through

There are three positive credit points. First, MISC improved operating profit and cash flow despite a declining revenue environment. Second, net debt/equity of 0.20x is conservative for a capital-intensive company with vessels and offshore assets. Third, cash headroom against near-term maturities is substantial, and the company also has a track record of repaying the USD400mn bond in April 2025.

On the other hand, it is premature to make a major upward reassessment of credit quality based only on these results. In Gas Assets & Solutions, key issues are the redeployment of older LNG vessels, post-expiry revenue, vessel disposals, and the treatment of idle vessels. Petroleum & Product Shipping made a large contribution in 2025, but earnings would decline if freight markets weaken. Offshore Business should be supported by earnings after the transition to operations, but for new FPSO projects, construction delays and cost overruns need to be monitored. In Marine & Heavy Engineering, the quality of the order book and cost control are important, not merely the maintenance of profitability.

Liquidity is strong, but capital commitments are large. Approved and contracted capital commitments at end-FY2025 were RM7.86bn, and the future credit profile will depend on the extent to which investment, dividends, and repayments can be funded from internal resources.

Structurally, the relationship with PETRONAS is treated as a credit support factor. However, the GMTN structure is one in which MISC Capital Two (Labuan) Limited is the issuer and MISC Berhad is the guarantor, and we have not confirmed a direct guarantee from PETRONAS or the Malaysian government.

What To Watch Next

The next item to check is the FY2026 first-quarter results. As of 22 May 2026, we had not confirmed the release on MISC’s official website. Key points to review are the strength of operating cash flow, the impact of contract expiries in Gas Assets & Solutions, and market conditions in Petroleum & Product Shipping.

In addition, the alignment between capital expenditure and contracted revenue should be checked. LNG fleet renewal, LNG vessels for SeaRiver, VLECs, and FPSO/FSO-related investments create long-term revenue, but require upfront funding. The items to review are counterparties, contract periods, charter rates, MISC’s capital contributions, and the allocation of construction risk.

Finally, dividends, debt management, ratings, and bond terms should be reviewed. The focus is whether high dividends and debt reduction can coexist, whether net debt/equity can be maintained around 0.20x, whether S&P BBB+ / Stable and Moody's Baa2 / Stable are maintained, and whether the key terms of the GMTN contain any weaknesses from an investor-protection perspective.

Sources

Unconfirmed Items