CRC Credit Research Compendium
Menu
日本語English

Issuer Credit Research

Issuer Flash: NH Investment & Securities Co., Ltd.

Issuer: Nh Investment Securities | Document: Issuer Flash | Date: 2026-06-22 | Event: 1q26 Results

Report date: 2026-06-22 Event date: 2026-05-14 Event title: 1Q26 quarterly report and earnings

1. Flash Conclusion

NH Investment & Securities' 1Q26 quarterly report confirms a very strong earnings quarter and modestly reinforces the near-term positive tone in the latest issuer_summary. Consolidated operating profit was KRW 636.7bn, up 120.3% year on year, and controlling-shareholder net income was KRW 475.7bn, up 128.4%. Net fee income, net interest income, FVTPL gains, and FX gains all contributed, so the quarter was not dependent on a single accounting item. Regulatory capital also remained strong, with the disclosed consolidated net capital ratio rising to 2,449.4% from 2,267.7% at end-2025.

The credit reading is still more balanced than the headline earnings imply. The same quarter also showed rapid balance-sheet expansion: consolidated assets rose to KRW 99.1tn from KRW 83.4tn at end-2025, while liabilities rose to KRW 89.1tn from KRW 73.9tn. This is not negative by itself for a large securities company, but it means that the earnings positive should be read together with market exposure, funding needs, collateral liquidity, and capital consumption. The flash conclusion is therefore "earnings and capital confirmation positive, but not a change to bank-like stability." The issuer remains a highly rated, group-supported securities company whose credit profile can move quickly if trading volumes, valuation gains, IB activity, or funding markets reverse.

2. What Was Announced

The DART quarterly report for the period ended March 2026 was disclosed on 2026-05-14. It confirms the strong 1Q26 figures that had been announced in the 2026-04-23 preliminary operating-results disclosure. On a consolidated basis, 1Q26 operating profit was KRW 636.7bn, profit before tax was KRW 650.1bn, net income was KRW 475.7bn, and net income attributable to controlling shareholders was KRW 475.7bn. These compare with KRW 289.0bn operating profit and KRW 208.2bn controlling-shareholder net income in 1Q25.

The earnings mix was broad. Consolidated net fee income was KRW 515.1bn, almost double the KRW 259.1bn recorded in 1Q25. Net interest income increased to KRW 265.5bn from KRW 214.1bn. Net gains on FVTPL financial instruments were KRW 106.4bn, compared with a KRW 55.4bn loss in 1Q25. FX gains were KRW 92.5bn, up from KRW 25.4bn. Credit-loss provisioning was KRW 11.1bn, higher than KRW 7.3bn in 1Q25 but still small relative to the quarter's earnings. The April preliminary disclosure and supporting articles point to strong brokerage, financial product sales, IB, and investment-management contribution, including high domestic stock trading activity and brokerage market share, but those business-line details should be treated as supporting context rather than the core official financial statement source.

The balance sheet expanded materially. Consolidated total assets were KRW 99.1tn at March 2026, up 18.8% from KRW 83.4tn at December 2025. Total liabilities rose 20.5% to KRW 89.1tn, while total equity rose 5.6% to KRW 10.0tn. Consolidated FVTPL financial assets increased to KRW 40.6tn, FVOCI financial assets to KRW 12.5tn, and amortized-cost financial assets to KRW 42.2tn. On the liability side, deposit liabilities increased to KRW 15.8tn, borrowings to KRW 34.4tn, and other financial liabilities to KRW 18.9tn; bonds issued were broadly stable at KRW 4.7tn.

3. Credit Read-Through

For bond investors, the positive part of the quarter is straightforward: the company generated enough earnings to add to equity and absorb ordinary credit costs, while its regulatory capital metric improved from an already high level. This supports the current issuer_summary view that NH Investment & Securities has an upper-tier credit foundation among Korean securities companies, helped by franchise scale, group support expectations, and strong capital-market earnings capacity. The official quarterly report also improves source quality compared with the previous summary's preliminary / article-based treatment of 1Q26.

The more important analytical point is that the quarter also illustrates the volatility channel. A large part of the improvement came from market-sensitive lines: fees linked to client flow and capital-market activity, FVTPL valuation and trading gains, FX gains, and investment-related income. These are useful earnings sources in good markets, but they are not equivalent to a bank's deposit-funded net interest income. If equity trading value declines, credit spreads widen, rates move unfavourably, or client risk appetite weakens, these earnings lines can fall together. The flash should therefore be read as confirmation that the issuer can monetize favourable markets, not as proof that the same quarterly run-rate is resilient through stress.

Balance-sheet growth is the main offsetting watchpoint. Asset growth was much faster than equity growth during the quarter, and consolidated liabilities rose faster than consolidated equity. The disclosed net capital ratio stayed very high because operating net capital rose and total risk amount was still manageable relative to the regulatory base, but the increase in financial assets, deposit liabilities, borrowings, and other financial liabilities makes liquidity and funding structure more important. For a securities company, the relevant question is not only whether reported equity is large, but whether liquid assets, collateral eligibility, margin capacity, secured funding, and roll-over access remain robust when markets are stressed.

The quarter does not change the main credit view. Parent support expectations from NongHyup Financial Group and the domestic AA+ rating remain important supports, but they should still be separated from a legal guarantee of individual bonds. The company is better positioned than many standalone securities firms, yet its credit profile remains exposed to market funding, IB / real estate / alternative-investment risk, and the future path of IMA growth. IMA could deepen the franchise and client-funding base, but it could also increase asset-risk and liquidity-mismatch exposure if product balances grow into less liquid corporate finance assets.

4. Key Numbers

Metric 1Q26 / Mar-2026 FY2025 / Dec-2025 or 1Q25 comparison Credit reading
Consolidated operating profit KRW 636.7bn KRW 289.0bn in 1Q25 Very strong quarter; should not be annualized without stress adjustment.
Net income attributable to controlling shareholders KRW 475.7bn KRW 208.2bn in 1Q25 Adds to internal capital formation and confirms earnings capacity in favourable markets.
Net fee income KRW 515.1bn KRW 259.1bn in 1Q25 Indicates strong client-flow and IB / WM contribution, but market-sensitive.
FVTPL financial instrument net gains / losses KRW 106.4bn gain KRW 55.4bn loss in 1Q25 Positive swing is supportive, but also confirms market-price sensitivity.
Credit-loss provision expense KRW 11.1bn KRW 7.3bn in 1Q25 Still modest relative to earnings; asset-quality detail remains a monitoring item.
Consolidated total assets KRW 99.1tn KRW 83.4tn at Dec-2025 Rapid balance-sheet expansion; funding and liquidity need close monitoring.
Consolidated total equity KRW 10.0tn KRW 9.4tn at Dec-2025 Equity increased, but slower than assets.
Consolidated net capital ratio 2,449.4% 2,267.7% at Dec-2025 Strong regulatory capital buffer; not a substitute for liquidity and risk-composition analysis.
Separate-basis regulatory leverage ratio 677.4% 633.3% at Dec-2025 Leverage rose; relevant for monitoring balance-sheet growth and risk appetite.

5. What To Watch Next

The next key test is 2Q26 and later earnings normalization. If profit remains supported by diversified client flow, IB mandates, product distribution, and disciplined investment operations, the 1Q result would give stronger evidence of recurring earnings capacity. If earnings fall sharply with weaker markets, the right interpretation will be that 1Q was a favourable-market buffer rather than a structural step-up.

Balance-sheet composition should be tracked alongside earnings. The important figures are FVTPL assets, amortized-cost financial assets, borrowings, bonds issued, deposit liabilities, other financial liabilities, credit-loss provisions, NCR, adjusted operating net capital ratio, and any disclosure of liquidity or maturity structure. The increase in amortized-cost financial assets and other financial liabilities in 1Q26 particularly deserves follow-up because it may reflect growth in financing, collateral, settlement, or corporate-finance-related exposures that cannot be judged fully from headline profit.

Detailed maturity ladder, CP / electronic short-term note balances, committed lines, secured funding capacity, FX liquidity, collateral pool, derivative margin exposure, and stress liquidity plan remain unconfirmed in this flash and should be checked in future disclosures or before a bond-specific investment decision. Full NICE, Korea Ratings, and S&P rating-report detail was also not freshly reviewed for this event; rating commentary should be checked when assessing support assumptions, funding access, and risk appetite.

For IMA and IB, the flash does not change the existing monitoring stance. The next disclosures should be checked for IMA balances, product maturities, investment assets, liquidity reserves, reference yields, client complaints, and regulatory responses. Strong earnings create room to absorb risk, but a securities company can consume that buffer quickly if it expands balance-sheet assets into less liquid or higher-credit-risk exposures. The credit view remains constructive, but it depends on disciplined growth, stable funding access, and preservation of capital headroom.

6. Sources